Investor purchases may amplify affordable housing pressures

With affordable housing supply lacking, typical buyers face long odds against the business-minded

Investor purchases may amplify affordable housing pressures

With affordable housing supply lacking, typical buyers face long odds against the business-minded
Investor purchases may amplify affordability pressures

When it comes to buying homes in today’s tight housing market, survival of the flushest tends to separate winners from losers.

Downpayments approximately 118% higher in the third quarter than they were in 2019 reflects one driver — and symptom — of a housing access shift landing the keys of more homes in the hands of real estate investors than owner-occupied homebuyers.

“With affordability still stretched and inventory tight, many would-be buyers remain sidelined, giving investors a larger share of the market and, in some areas, more influence over prices,” commented Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, in a new report highlighting the premium investors pay to land the deals they want.

As typical buyers pulled back from the market amid persistent affordability pressures, investors’ share of overall home purchases edged higher, “helping drive prices upward in markets where competition for homes remains intense,” the report says.

Among major U.S. metros, investors paid the largest premiums — defined as the difference between median sales prices for investor-purchased homes and overall local sales — in Los Angeles, San Diego, New York, San Francisco and Nashville, Tenn., “where rental demand remains strong and affordability constraints continue to sideline typical buyers.”

Investors paid 19.8%, 9.2%, 8.7%, 6.8% and 3.4% above median local sales prices in those metros, respectively, in the third quarter.

“As a result, investor activity can amplify price pressures,” Hale explained, “especially in markets where their purchases concentrate in already competitive price ranges.”

By state, investors paid the highest premium in Montana (35.1%), Utah (33.7%), California (23.3%), New York (12.3%) and Vermont (3.2%).

However, investors also bargain shopped, purchasing homes up to 50% below median local sales prices in more affordable markets.

The largest gaps between median investor purchase prices and overall purchase prices in the second quarter emerged in Michigan (53.1%), Maryland (45.4%), Virginia (45%), Delaware (41.4%) and Wisconsin (40.7%).

The report indicates these markets and price levels provide investors with the best “rent-to-price ratios and long-term income potential.”

At the metro level, these discounts were concentrated in the mid-Atlantic and Midwestern cities of Detroit, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Cleveland and Milwaukee, where investors paid 58%, 52.7%, 52%, 51.4% and 50.1% lower than the median local sales price, respectively.

Author

More Headlines

Top Dollar Volume

Top FHA Volume

Top HELOC Volume

Most Loans Closed

Top Mortgage Brokers

Top Non-QM Volume

Top Purchase Volume

Top Refinance Volume

Top USDA Volume

Top VA Volume

Top Veteran Originators

Top Jumbo Originators

For Top Originators rankings going back to 2010, see the April editions of the magazine in our digital magazine library

Top Women Originators

Top Overall

Top Wholesale

Top Retail

Top Non-QM

Top FHA

Top VA

Top Correspondent

Top Bank Statement

Top DSCR

For Top Mortgage Lenders rankings going back to 2010, see the June editions of the magazine in our digital magazine library

Sign in to Scotsman Guide PRO

error: Content is protected !!

We found an account with this email.
Please log in or reset your password to continue.